The recommendations from our research centre on a multi-stakeholder approach, where business, local leaders, communities, children and parents, regional and national governments, and civil society combine their efforts and resources towards the goal of improving children’s lives and reducing reliance on child labour within the community. Simply barring children from the mines or choosing a “less risky” supplier/region will only further impoverish families who rely on their children’s income and may push children into even more dangerous work.
You can read short summaries of the key recommendations below for Business, Civil Society, Investors, and Governments. More detailed recommendations in the key theme areas are available in downloadable PDF’s.
To gain knowledge of the region and coordinate collaborative action, further research should be undertaken to understand the network of actors that operate both within DRC itself and externally, and the levers necessary to affect change. This includes the various armed groups and their tribal power dynamics, government actors whose influence over public life and the mineral industry may or may not be legitimate, industry actors and their links to both government and tribal groups, and the capability and capacity of civil society organisations acting in the region.
In the short term, mine safety must be improved by providing PPE, mining machinery and equipment, and improving mine management systems to reduce injury and loss of life. Longer-term interventions should focus on improving the livelihoods and wellbeing of the mining community as a whole, increasing the earnings of miners to a level where they can support their family without resorting to child labour, and creating alternative pathways to similarly well-paid employment in safer and more desirable occupations.
Younger children would benefit from initiatives to make school more accessible and remove barriers to attendance, building schools closer to mine sites, improving teacher training in subject matter and positive teaching methods, school meals programmes, and provision of books and equipment. Other services such as access to solar charging points, free wi-fi access and school gardens would further incentivise children of school age to pursue education. Access to education is important, but a quality education in safe and well-equipped schools has the best chance of creating lasting change.
Any interventions to reduce child labour must also address family poverty and ensure that removing children from work does not lead to a loss of income that significantly lowers living standards. The key to the success of any project will be the consent and participation of children and their families from the mining communities in planning and decision making, empowering the community to lead themselves to a better life.
Business
Companies should collaborate with industry and cross-industry peers to address child labour using a bottom-up approach, forging partnerships in source countries with local businesses, civil society, and community leaders to implement programmes and initiatives to improve the lives of children in mining communities. Industry-level approaches are crucial to achieving the scale and consistency required to effectively map and implement effective, long-term change that reduces the risks for children and companies alike.
To meaningfully address the risks to children, companies and investors, approaches need to focus on the fastest way to holistically address the risks to children. Due diligence requirements need to be re-framed from a bottom-up perspective. KPIs and resources need to focus less on identification of risk, and more effectively focus on regional and cross-industry collaboration to directly address the context which enables child labour to exist. Develop bottom-up due diligence approaches focused on collective action rather than individual risk. Interventions must focus on narrowing the gaps where fraud and corruption can damage the credibility of traceability processes and, more fundamentally, address aspects of traceability schemes which are putting inequitable pressure on the most vulnerable actors in the supply chain.
Redirecting sourcing away from artisanal mining in areas of high reputational risk will only worsen the situation for mining communities and the children working within them, removing the major source of income, and threatening the livelihoods of people already experiencing significant levels of poverty. Rather, focus on developing faster cross-industry collaboration and initiatives to see commodity origin communities a core part of the industries they enable. For example, this lens can help place a focus on interventions that can effectively and safely bring value addition into source countries, developing a more comprehensive mining sector and enabling local communities to retain maximum value for their product.
Models need to effectively utilise investor and company leverage together with government and civil society actors in-line with the private sector’s role in the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights.
Civil Society
Coordinate Human Rights efforts with local and national government and other aid agencies, developing collective long-term strategies for improving the lives of children that do not run the risk of being cut short due to funding or resourcing challenges.
Develop projects to help facilitate free, accessible, and safe education, improved teaching standards and positive child interaction. Collaborate with local private enterprise to provide vocational training for youth with links to well-paid jobs in safe environments and nurture new enterprise / support local industries in the community.
Investors
Tantalum-utilising sectors must recognise and engage with the critical role that mining and extraction origin communities play in their industry. This lens would enable more strategic, long-term approaches to improving the livelihoods of mining communities and the working conditions for all mine workers, particularly children and youth. Recognising the importance of ASM miners as key stakeholders must be borne out by giving miners a platform at all levels within the industry to promote their interests and articulate their concerns. Investors are ideally suited to drive a collaborative approach, with representation of actors from all levels of the supply chain and cross-industry collaboration.
Develop bottom-up due diligence approaches focused on collective action rather than individual risk.
Investors should ask how ESG and analyst requirements can be re-framed in ways which will lead to better and faster outcomes and impact where child labour exists - and enable investors and companies to better engage in these approaches.
For example, introducing requirements to encourage the majority of ESG related resources and activities towards collective action in source countries tackling human rights issues, rather than on data requirements which lead to auditing and traceability activities. Interventions must focus on narrowing the gaps where fraud and corruption can damage the credibility of traceability processes and, more fundamentally, address aspects of traceability schemes which are putting inequitable pressure on the most vulnerable actors in the supply chain.
Governments
Governments of source countries must focus on improving conditions for workers, including employment rights and minimum wage legislation that ensures employers are legally responsible for good practice. Increase social protection for families and child protection legislation, ensuring that children and their families have a voice in policy making to take account of their unique challenges and needs.
Labour inspections should be increased with consequences for employers with children working in unsafe conditions, whilst ensuring that the children are not disadvantaged financially. Increase formalisation of the mining sector, for example by digitising mining licenses to automatically distribute the correct level of tax revenue to the regions to be effectively re-invested. Work with the private sector to develop safe job-creation schemes and improve infrastructure in and around mining communities, including transport, electricity, energy, and internet connectivity.
International governments should use political pressure and trade incentives to encourage governments in source countries to prioritise improving the lives of children. Foreign aid budgets should be spent in source countries as much as possible, with the goal of tackling the root causes of child labour by reducing poverty in local communities, improving health and educational services, developing infrastructure, and creating safe, well-paid jobs.
Project funding should be guaranteed, long-term, and be coordinated with other countries so that efforts to tackle child labour are resilient and consistent.